How to Distinguish from Similar Species: This is the only species of sand dollar found in Washington and Oregon. As with other sand dollars this species is very flat, at least 5x as wide as tall. All other echinoids in the area are at least half as tall as wide. Several other sand dollars can be found on the Pacific coast. D. vizcainoensis lives in Baja California and has coarser tubercles. D. laevis is smaller and fragile, with a smaller petalidium and lives in deeper water off California. The northern sand dollar, Echinarachnius parma, is flatter, more symmetrical, and the petalidium is more centered on the shell. It lives in Alaska and the Arctic Ocean.
Geographical Range: Alaska to Baja California.
Depth Range: Just below the surf zone on sandy bottoms, down to 40 m depth (but mostly more shallow)
Habitat: Subtidal on sandy bottoms, on open coast and in sandy lagoons. A few live intertidally and bury themselves.
Biology/Natural History: Adult sand dollars move mainly by waving their spines, while juveniles use their tube feet. The tube feet along the petalidium are larger and are used for respiration. Tube feet elsewhere on the body are smaller and are used for feeding and locomotion. Individuals live subtidally, just beyond the surf, and flat on the bottom or at an angle and partly buried. They frequently move around if they are lying flat. If a current is present they usually lie at an angle and partly buried. Most individuals in the colony will be lying at a similar angle. In very rough water most lie flat and partly buried. Adults feed on detritus and diatoms swept to the mouth by cilia. If lying at an angle, it also catches small prey and algae with its pedicellariae, tube feet, and spines and passes them to the mouth. Their mouth includes a small aristotle's lantern. Predators include the seastar Pisaster brevispinus and the starry flounder Platichthys stellatus. Sometimes settled on by a small barnacle Balanus pacificus. Spawn in late spring and early summer. Fertilization is external. Juveniles swallow heavy sand grains, especially those with iron, which may help serve as a "weight belt" for them. May live 10-13 years. May be aged by counting growth rings on the plates of the test. Relative ages of individuals can be determined by counting the pores in a petal of the petalidium.
Vaughn and Strathmann (2008) discovered that when pluteus larvae of this species are exposed to mucus from a fish predator, they begin to divide asexually by budding and fission. This results in a smaller average size for the larvae and also in a longer time for development. Vaughn and Strathman hypothesized that the adaptive value of this response may be that the smaller individuals are less likely to be eaten by the fish--a refuge in size. Presumably the slower development and longer time they spend as a pelagic larva, which is usually regarded as a disadvantage, is counterbalanced in this case by the temporary avoidance of fish predation.
Steven C. Beadle (1991) notes that dendrasterid sand dollars such as this species are first found in late Miocene sediments in central California. They spread north to Alaska during the Quaternary and supplanted an abundant older fauna of symmetrical sand dollars.
Hardy and Merz (2012) report that juveniles of this species, when inverted, spin around so that the posterior end is facing down-current. That orientation gives them the best configuration for being flipped back upright by the current.
Flora and Fairbanks, 1966
Kozloff 1987, 1996
Smith and Carlton, 1975
Beadle, Steven C., 1991. The biogeography of origin and radiation: dendrasterid sand dollars in the northeastern Pacific. Paleobiology 17:4 325-339
Chan, Kit Yu Karen, 2012. Biomechanics of larval morphology affect swimming: insights from sand dollars Dendraster excentricus. Integrative and Comparative Biology 52:4 pp. 458-469
Grunbaum, D. and R. R. Strathmann, 2003. Form, performance, and trade-offs in swimming and stability of armed larvae. J. Mar. Res. 61: pp 659-691
Hardy, Adam R. and Rachel A. Merz, 2012. Inverted sand dollars orient themselves in flow to increase likelihood of righting. Invertebrate Biology 132:1 pp 52-61
McEdward, Larry R. and Benjamin G. Miner, 2006. Estimation and interpretation of egg provisioning in marine invertebrates. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46:3 pp 224-232
Strathmann, Richard R. and Daniel Grunbaum, 2006. Good eaters, poor swimmers: compromises in larval form. Integrative and Comparative Biology 46:3 pp 312-322
Telford, Malcolm and Olaf Ellers, 1998. The moving teeth of echinoids. pp. 843-848 in Rich Mooi and Malcolm Telford (eds), Echinoderms: San Francisco. Proceedings of the Ninth International Echinoderm Conference, San Francisco, California USA 5-9 August 1996.
Dawn and Richard R. Strathmann, 2008. Predators
in echinoderm larvae. Science 319:1503
General Notes and Observations: Locations, abundances, unusual behaviors:
Authors and Editors of Page:
Dave Cowles (2006): Created original page